Greens Genes

A recent study shows that how people metabolize different foods is based their ancestral heritage, and that dietary guidelines are overly broad.

Different diets work for different people. That is one of the primary takeaways from a fascinating new study at Cornell University, which shows how human genetics customize to specific diets over generations, optimizing the body for the metabolism of certain foods. Unfortunately, that message didn’t reach as many people as it could have, thanks to how many media outlets handled it.

“A Vegetarian Diet Might not be as Healthy as you Think,” ran one headline. “Being Vegetarian Could Kill You, Science Warns,” screeched another.

Meat lovers rejoiced. Animal lovers panicked. The researchers who conducted the study wondered how a press release titled “Eating Green Could be in Your Genes,” which was sent to the media days ahead of its official release, could have gotten the story so wrong.

After the initial flare-up and predictable backlash, most responses to the study were either “OMG vegetarian diet causes cancer” or “OMG that is BS.”

The study, published in the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution, compared the genes of people who come from vegetarian societies with those from non-vegetarian and primarily meat-eating societies. And while the paper didn’t make specific dietary recommendations, the authors do extrapolate that a diet appropriate for someone with meat-eating genes might not work for someone with the so-called “vegetarian gene” the researchers were studying.

The story begins with genes that code for an enzyme, called FADS2, which helps the body process the omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids we eat. We need both of these types of oil, and it is becoming increasingly clear that the two fats should be present in the body in roughly equal parts. Omega-3 is anti-inflammatory, while Omega-6 is pro-inflammatory. Inflammation is key to our bodies’ defense mechanisms, but too much or chronic inflammation can help cause many types of disease.

The FADS2 gene has a mutant, or “allele” form, dubbed the vegetarian allele because it helps people regulate their balance of omega-3 and omega-6 oils when they come from plant-based sources. The team found that, as expected, this allele is most common in predominantly vegetarian populations like India.

They also suspected the vegetarian gene would be problematic among people who eat primarily meat, because omega-3 and 6 oils from animal products are metabolized differently. Indeed, the vegetarian allele is quite infrequent in Greenland, and actually seems to have been deleted from genes where, generations ago, it existed.

“Our genetic heritage, to some degree, tailors our genes to specific foods, and when that changes dramatically, there may be a mismatch,” explains the study’s lead author Tom Brenna of Cornell in a presentation released by his lab.

This mismatch between diet and genes is the underlying premise behind the concepts of precision medicine and precision nutrition, which “means making recommendations on a person by person basis rather than on global means, which is what dietary guidelines do,” Brenna adds.

Study co-author Alon Keinan pointed out that heart disease is more likely than cancer to arise from an imbalance between omega-6 and omega-3 fats.

Another rich source of omega-6 are certain vegetable oils like sunflower, safflower and soybean oils. The recent gain in popularity of these oils in the western diet has helped skew the balance of omega-3 and omega-6 in many people. While the ideal ratio is 1:1, among those who consume a western diet, it is now as high as 15:1 in favor of omega-6.

This is just fine, according to the American Heart Association and other establishment groups, which have recently doubled down on their denial of the idea that too much omega-6 is a concern. But among researchers at the front lines, there is growing agreement regarding the importance of balance over absolute quantities of these oils. And the food industry, which once celebrated the health benefits of omega-6 oils, is now quietly breeding its oilseed plants toward omega-3 heavy profiles, Brenna explained in the presentation.

“Sunflower oil used to be 75 percent omega-6,” he says. “Most of it now is high oleic [meaning high omega-3], and is about 10 percent linoleic [meaning high omega-6].”

Today’s industrially produced vegetable oils, in fact, have come to resemble olive oil, Brenna says, which is the “stereotypical high-oleic oil.” The fact that other oils are transitioning to high-oleics is good, he believes. But this isn’t yet a worldwide trend, and developing countries are still using the high-linoleic versions, he says: “I’m quite concerned about developing countries in this regard.”

In other words, those who have the vegetarian gene but eat a western, fast food-based diet are particularly at risk. This helps explain the skyrocketing levels of cancer, heart disease and diabetes in India: People are consuming a diet that doesn’t suit their genes.

With so much nuance and diversity in finding someone’s ideal dietary requirements, Brenna says, “What I’m worried about is folks just focusing on vegetables vs. meat.”

(1) comment

paul cee

Brenna is a shill for the seafood industry - i was able to determine this in less than five minutes (does anyone source these sensational articles?). go to his website "Fats of Life" and half of the sites recommended support the seafood industry. his org is financed by the "Global Organization for EPA and DHA Omega-3s" (sound familiar?) that website discusses the importance of eating ... fish. he is getting paid to make his conclusions by a clever group disguising the commercial fishing industry as an org concerned with human health. omegas are nice (and found in all manner of plants) but last i heard mercury and dioxin aren't (thats why Trader Joe's has little notes telling pregnant women not to eat too much fish). while his study 'may suggest' his conclusion, we already know the number one killer of all people is heart disease and animal cholesterol is the number one cause of heart disease.

before we spread BS like this to an unknowing public, we should at least source these studies ... 'PhD' and 'Cornell' don't get a pass.

so skip the bacon fest, your time is better spent reading "The China Study," the worlds most complete and unassailable study on human-related health and nutrition. why haven't you heard of it? well, there is a trillion dollar industry that would rather keep it that way.

and if you are a bacon troll, then i challenge you: don't be a fake carnivore and cook your bacon. eat your bacon raw - like a real carnivore would.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.