Jason Burnett

Left to right: Pacific Grove Mayor Bill Kampe, Carmel-by-the-Sea Mayor Jason Burnett and Sand City Mayor David Pendergrass at a January meeting of the Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority.

For the past month, Monterey Peninsula Regional Water Authority and its partners have kept details on an important development in the region's water supply—a bid to push back the state-ordered schedule to reduce pumping of the Carmel River—secret.

Today MPRWA officials changed course, releasing the draft proposal in advance of their Feb. 12 meeting.

The proposal, dated Jan. 14, argues California American Water has "diligently and aggressively" worked to comply with the State Water Resources Control Board's 2009 cease-and-desist order, which set a December 2016 deadline for Cal Am to reduce its Carmel River pumping by 70 percent.

But even the best-case scenario, according to Cal Am figures, puts the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project—anchored by a large seawater desalination plant—online in 2020-21. So MPRWA and Cal Am are asking for more time.

As the Weekly reported Jan. 15, the state water board has already rejected two similar proposals within the past year, according to MPRWA member and Carmel-by-the-Sea Mayor Jason Burnett. But this latest proposal, he says, is making progress: "We're on the right track."

Highlights from the draft proposal: 

1. A four-year extension, pushing the 70-percent cutback deadline back to Dec. 31, 2020.

2. A process giving officials from the state water board's Division of Water Rights authority to extend the deadline "for good cause."

3. Starting in the 2015-16 water year, Cal Am will ratchet back its illegal pumping from the Carmel River by an additional 1,000 acre-feet per year—beyond the reduction already achieved. 

4. Cal Am will set the following milestones:

  • Construction of downstream fish passage facilities at the Los Padres Dam by September 2016.
  • Groundbreaking on the desalination plant by September 2017.
  • Construction for the desal plant "substantially on schedule" by September 2018 and September 2019.
  • Desal plant complete by September 2020.

5. If Cal Am misses any of the above milestones, it will have to reduce Carmel River pumping by another 1,000 acre-feet per year—on top of the reductions described in point 3 above…

6. …unless Division of Water Rights officials determine, at MPRWA/Cal Am/Monterey Peninsula Water Management Authority request, that Cal Am and the local water agencies have tried their best to hit the milestones. In that case, they can decide not to slap Cal Am's wrist.

7. In the meantime, Cal Am will look to acquire other water rights in order to reduce its illegal diversions from the Carmel River.

Other points to the proposed cutback order modification are more technical, but you can read the whole thing (which MPRWA Executive Director Jim Cullem says will be posted tomorrow) in the Feb. 12 MPRWA agenda packet.

(2) comments

The Dog Father

Well kudos to Pebble Beach for finding an alternative water supply to
keep golf courses green, but the overall water usage will not decrease
one iota, because they are simply using the saved water for more
development. They are developing 90 new "estate" lots, 100 new hotel
rooms, and now are planning on building a rental apartment complex where
a forest now stands. Almost 7000 mature trees have been forever
destroyed in the latest round of development, and they want to destroy
another 700+ for the apartments. "Green" is the last thing that Pebble
Beach Company is. And our so-called representatives Dave Potter and
Jane Parker (who ran on an environmental platform) are all in favor of
replacing rare forest habitat with development in the midst of a
drought.
For more info on the water situation in PB, www.delmonteneighborhood.org

Marc Del Piero

For the first time, the reference to Cal-Am's need for the acquisition of additional water rights reveals the "gorilla in the closet" that knowledgeable folks have complained about for a decade. Since Cal-Am has no water rights in the Salinas Valley, and since there are no water rights that are not already owned/held by overlying land owners in the over-drafted Salinas Valley groundwater basin, whose water rights are proposed to be "taken/stolen" for the economic benefit of Cal-Am? And how can the mayors, who are helping Cal-Am to trample on the groundwater rights and property rights of innocent third party land owners, going to rationalize their intentional "taking" of private property rights for the sole benefit of a private, out of state, for profit corporation?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.