Three candidates are vying for the District 4 seat on the Marina City Council in November.
District 4, which covers the southern end of Marina and the new development in and around the Dunes, will have a new face, as incumbent Liesbeth Visscher is running for mayor in a race against Mike Moeller and Ana Luz Acevedo-Cabrera. As the representative for the fastest-growing area of the city, the new councilmember will have to navigate the growing pains that come with it, while also ensuring the rest of the city keeps pace.
Voters in the district will choose between Athena Burciaga, Brad Imamura and Mike Simmons.
Burciaga, a computer science major at CSU Monterey Bay, is the co-chair of the Central Coast Democratic Socialists of America. She is involved with the Rainbow Raft Pride Center at CSUMB, and has worked with the city and county officials to draft resolutions in support of LGBTQ+ residents, including Transgender Day of Visibility in Marina.
Burciaga says it is through efforts such as these that have allowed her to interact with members of the community and learn what the needs are.
With housing, “I haven’t met one Marina resident who can afford these new homes being built,” she says. The City needs to work with CSUMB to develop “missing middle” housing for young adults and working families, while also continuing capping the rent increases on the City-owned Preston Park and Abrams Park developments.
Burciaga says she is a “hard no” on Measure Q, the 7-percent utility users tax on the November ballot.
“We can’t balance the budget on the back of working class folks in Marina,” she says.
Imamura is a director on the Marina Coast Water District Board who has spent his career in public service, including with the City of San Jose and Santa Clara Valley Water District.
Water security, housing and commercial development are some of the top issues why Imamura says he is running for council.
Imamura says there is “no such thing as affordable housing” in Marina—“It’s expensive.” Instead, it should be categorized as “subsidized” housing while the City pursues homes that the general public can actually afford, according to Imamura, such as exploring more high-density developments.
While he agrees Marina is in need of upgraded public facilities, Imamura says he is opposed to Measure Q, adding that there is no guarantee in the measure’s language it will be used for that new infrastructure.
“We already have issues with affordability,” he says. “I understand that we have some infrastructure needs. I’m really pro-smart development to get more commercial and retail in Marina to help our tax base and get them to partner and remodel this infrastructure.”
Simmons, who currently sits on the Marina Planning Commission, has worked in retail for 30 years, managing budgets and teams. Before moving to Marina, Simmons served on other committees, including the Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury.
That time in government and business gives him the leadership experience that carries over into public service, he says.
Simmons says Marina has done a good job with affordable housing and crafting regulations for accessory dwelling units. The City is also in the midst of updating its short-term rental ordinance, which Simmons says can be a “good thing if they’re managed properly.” But “we still have a long ways to go,” he notes, saying the City needs to have a focus on workforce housing.
Measure Q needs to pass to provide updated facilities to serve residents, Simmons says.
“I don’t see any other alternative,” he says. “If the UUT passes, I’m dedicated to making sure those funds are used for the building of the facilities and that’s it. If we can lower that percentage, we should do so.”
In District 1, incumbent Brian McCarthy is running unopposed. First elected in 2022, McCarthy said he will continue to be publicly accessible and research issues to make decisions that are best for Marina residents.

(1) comment
A sober assessment of the District 4 City Council race reveals a stark contrast in how the candidates approach the actual, unglamorous mechanics of municipal governance. For a voter who prizes fiscal discipline, transparency, and a willingness to confront hard choices, Athena Burciaga is the clear and necessary choice.
District 4 is an economically diverse cross-section of Marina, encompassing both the affluent new subdivisions and the legacy properties of Preston and Abrams Parks. The financial decisions regarding those two communities represent perhaps one of the most complex and consequential fiscal challenges facing the next council. The resolution will require confronting difficult realities about municipal debt, long-term civic commitments, and the solvency of our local budget.
It is highly instructive, then, to observe which candidates are prepared to govern the WHOLE district. Ms. Burciaga has distinguished herself as the only candidate with the intellectual fortitude to acknowledge the Preston and Abrams issue directly. She is actively engaging with the difficult questions that the rest of the field seems determined to ignore.
By contrast, the campaigns of both Mike Simmons and Brad Imamura - both registered Republicans, though Mr. Imamura is notably more explicit in courting the local GOP apparatus - appear comfortably confined to the newer subdivisions. One is left to wonder whether their silence on the massive, localized challenge in their own district is a matter of calculated political evasion, or simply a profound obliviousness to the realities beyond their immediate neighborhoods. Either possibility suggests a fundamental lack of preparation for the council seat.
Mr. Simmons touts his business acumen, yet champions Measure Q - a 7% GENERAL utility tax that asks the taxpayer to provide an open-ended revenue stream WITHOUT ANY LEGALLY BINDING GUARANTEE that the funds will be restricted to the public safety facilities used to market it. It is difficult to reconcile a claim of fiscal prudence with the endorsement of a PERPETUALLY UNFOCUSED TAX BURDEN.
Mr. Imamura, meanwhile, leans upon his past public service. However, there was that instance reported from 2008 to 2009 in the San Jose Mercury News regarding questionable administrative practices during his tenure in that city which give me significant pause. When a candidate asks to be entrusted with the fiduciary oversight of our city's budget, one hopes for a resumé free of such asterisks.
True fiscal conservatism requires confronting the ledger as it exists and demanding accountability for every tax dollar extracted. Ms. Burciaga’s opposition to the structural flaws of Measure Q, combined with her courage in addressing the district’s most complex housing and debt challenges head-on, demonstrates a seriousness of purpose that her opponents simply lack.
Marina requires council members who will govern with their eyes open to the ENTIRE city's balance sheet, NOT JUST THE MORE COMFORTABLE PORTIONS OF IT.
Our household shall proudly cast its ballots for Athena Burciaga.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.