Andre's foie gras

The foie gras with brioche and pear sauce from Andre's Bouchee is barely legal. 

It’s the ol’ game of duck, duck, no duck, duck.

California famously outlawed engorged duck liver, aka foie gras, in 2012, because of the scary sounding phenomenon of the force-feeding it includes.

That makes it an easy target for shallow rants like a recent Gawker piece that calls people who eat it assholes without doing any research into how the duck experiences it.

As I wrote in my discussion of the ban, "A look ahead at 2012 (Part One): The Foie Gras Ban": 

It appears patently cruel: Force feeding a duck so its liver gets abnormally fatty and gourmands can indulge in the uniquely flavorful results.

Part of that evaluation, though, comes from a very human tendency: Our need to anthropomorphize everything to understand it.

I mean, we instinctively reason, who do you know that would be stoked to have, say, Cheez-Its rammed down her gullet?

There is a difference that bears a mention, though, just as the controversy deserves more consideration than a gut reaction.

I'm not endorsing foie gras—only a few preps have done it for me anyway—but I was surprised to find how little some of the simple, relevant facts circulate: Ducks are natural gorgers who swallow food whole without chewing, who are essentially tube fed by their parents as babies, and who have no nerve endings in their throats.

Now it's back, and local chefs are stoked.

•••

Back when the law came into being, one of my favorite renegade chefs called me to arrange a clandestine meeting at the much-missed Independent Marketplace farmers market paradise in Sand City.

As I detail in "Underground foie gras-marijuana-moonshine appetizer rules," he brought me a $1,225 snack with quality pot, Apple Pie Ridge moonshine and foie on buttermilk-bread toast.

The kicker, according to the note he included:

"The food cost $25. The fine for the foie, which was banned July 1 in California, would cost $1,000. The fine for the Mary Jane would run $100. Same for the moonshine."

"Isn't it a sad commentary," chef told me later, "when the penalty for a food product like foie gras carries a 10 times higher fine than fresh herb and moonshine?"

•••

Yesterday a federal judge overturned the state's ban on the sale of the fatty duck and goose liver.

U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson found that the federal government's authority to regulate poultry products overrides the state law, and permanently blocked California's attorney general from laying down the duck law.

Opponents of the dish quickly asked Attorney General Kamala Harris to appeal.

Locally, foie gras-favoring chefs and restaurateurs are already flying high, including Stephan Lemaire of Andre's Bouchee (626-7880). 

"Now I can throw it back all over the menu without feeling I'm doing something illegal!" he writes by email. "I really never cared about the law because Andre would have continued serving it if he was still alive. Now I hope people spend more time minding there own business and not what others are eating.

"Fight fast food or meat injected with hormones!"

With Chef Jacques Zagouri, he's already arranged the Welcome Back Mr. Foie Dinner ($120) for Thursday, Jan 29, at Andre’s Bouchee in Carmel, with each dish paired with Oh Wines.

One the menu: foie gras terrine with Périgord truffle, seared foie gras with apple and Calvados sauce, monkfish stuffed with foie and filet mignon with foie gras and truffle sauce, with a foie gras macaroon to wrap the evening.

Chef Jeffrey Weiss of jennini kitchen + wine bar (920-2662) adds this via email:

On the one hand, as a chef I'm thrilled that the yoke of this activist-centric, weak-willed-politician-sponsored, knee-jerk reactionary, non-sensical bullshit law is off of our collective necks.

After a lot of personal research including visits to Hudson Valley Foie Gras, the now-defunct Sonoma Foie Gras, talks with the Daguin family (of D'Artagnan, one of the largest foie importers), and with Eduardo Sousa in Spain as part of Charcuteria: The Soul of Spain (Eduardo practices non-gavage foie gras), I decided that the practice of cultivating foie gras was not a detrimental act provided that I purchased it through an ethical farmer.

This pretty much speaks to the ethos of any chef—whether we are talking about fava beans or foie gras—which is why we happily served foie for the past several months at jeninni kitchen + wine bar in the form of foie gras hot dogs, foie terrines, and roasted potatoes w/ foie fat + truffles.

All of these dishes are going to be available on a special menu for the immediate future—let's celebrate a great victory for all of us, and raise a glass to chefs like Ken Frank, Doug Keane, David Bazirgan, and Ariane Daguin who never stopped fighting the good fight.

(1) comment

R.C. Smith

Well, Mark, you may consider this a rant also, regarding the ban on foie gras. I am not interested in ranting, but I do have a lot to say on this topic. You stated that ducks have no nerve endings in their throats, so how could they suffer from being constantly forcefed? Well, by that argument, women don't have many nerve endings inside their vaginas, so do you also think women cannot be raped? It's not about nerve endings and their placement; this issue is about how this country treats it's food sources.

Perhaps you've heard of a man named Mohandas Ghandi? He stated that a society's progress toward civilization can only be measured by how it treats its animals. Well, this is a prime example of how this country treats its animals and it's not particularly civilized. To get real facts, you should spend a day at a feedlot and end it by checking out the slaughterhouses. I have. There is a reason why slaughterhouse workers have the highest suicide rate of any job in the U.S.

It is one thing to eat meat and duck liver. I have no problem with meat eaters. But we MUST begin thinking about where our food comes from and how it's treated and "processed" on the journey to our tables. (You do know that it's standard procedure to throw a freshly slaughtered chicken into a huge vat of bleach as part of preparing it for market, right? Salmonella bad, bleach yummy. Every piece of factory farmed chicken you eat is 10 percent bleach, not to mention the hormones and antibiotics.) Enjoy!

But back to the ducks. The fact is that this "food" is created not only by force feeding the ducks continuously, but also by enclosing them in tiny cages so that there's no chance they might burn any calories. Oh, this reminds me of veal. I bet you like to say that veal production does no harm to the animal either.

I think it's a poor reflection of our "advanced" society that we institutionalize and base a large part of our economy on TORTURE of animals. If you are going to eat meat or animal based products, why must you torture your food before eating it? Kill it quickly and humanely and eat it! In any other context, the way this country treats it's animals would be an outrage not to mention illegal. But because some people make a lot of money off of animal cruelty, laws will continue to support it.

THIS IS AN ECONOMIC AND MORAL DEBATE

P.S. Hey Mark? Why don't you get your own identity and try not to rip off true thinkers like Hunter Thompson???? It is very sad.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.