Model of the Monterey Bay Shores project

A model shows the scope of the Monterey Bay Shores project.

After 21 years of planning, back and forth litigation with the Coastal Commission, and a whole lot of dollars spent, developer Ed Ghandour might finally get to build his Sand City eco-resort, Monterey Bay Shores.

The turning point began last spring, when Ghandour won an appeal in the San Francisco County Superior court that remanded Ghandour’s coastal development permit back to the Coastal Commission, which had twice denied the permit—once in 2000 and again in 2009.

According to Sarah Christie, the commission’s legislative director, the court’s decision hinged on sand dunes. The commission had deemed dunes on the proposed site environmentally sensitive habitat (ESHA), a claim that is inconsistent with Sand City’s local coastal plan (LCP), which states they are not ESHA.

The court ruled in favor of the Sand City LCP interpretation, and instructed the commission to work with Ghandour’s company Security National Guaranty (SNG) to come up with a revised plan that the commission would recommend for approval. Both were parties were instructed, once the revised plan was complete, to sign a binding agreement that halts further litigation until the commission votes on whether to grant a permit to the revised plan.

SNG submitted the revised plan in October of last year, and signed the binding agreement on Dec. 23. Charles Lester, the commission’s executive director, signed it the next day.

The public has until Feb. 12 to comment on the revised plan, the day when the Coastal Commission will meet in Pismo Beach for a vote on its fate. Although the agreement signed by Lester states that he must recommend approval for the project to the commission, Christie says commission members can still vote to deny it.

The settlement agreement, along with the revised plan and conditions of approval, is attached.

Settlement agreement for Monterey Bay Shores, including revised plans and conditions of approval.

 

(2) comments

carlyle seccombe

I think it is important for everyone to contact the Coastal Commission .I would like the MCweekly to cover an indepth story on this . It is not too late .Decisions will be made at a meeting in Santa Barbara April 9 2014. There is nothing Ecological about this" Ecoresort".This 360 unit complex and 1000 car garage has a LARGE footprint. It is not appropriate to build in the Sand Dunes These dunes on the Pacific Ocean are a Federally Designated critical habitat for the Westren Snowy Plover. It is important to keep this area an open space. It is a special nature area for the public.
Would this be allowed in Big Sur ?? To contact the Coastal Commission montereybayshoreresort@coastal.ca.gov.

Thanks Carlyle Seccombe

Leigh Fitz

It's tempting to let this happen, think of all those construction jobs!
Then we could all watch this bad idea sink into the waves, which of course will happen eventually. But dang it, we have a gorgeous, healthy bay to protect so this developer will just have to do something else...somewhere else.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.