Vistra file photo

When it came online in 2020, Vistra’s Moss Landing battery plant was the largest in the world, housing nearly 100,000 battery modules. They were destroyed in a fire that started on Jan. 16.

Here’s a riddle: What cools down faster, a battery storage plant fire, or the emotions of people who live and work adjacent to such a fire? 

Sara Rubin here with the regrettable answer to the above, which is: I don’t know. But I am curious to see what happens when the Monterey County Board of Supervisors begins a discussion tomorrow (Tuesday, Oct. 28) about placing a moratorium on new battery energy storage system (BESS) facilities. 

County Supervisor Glenn Church represents North County’s District 2, which includes Moss Landing where a BESS erupted in flames on Thursday, Jan. 16. Vistra’s Moss Landing Power Plant burned for days, and the fire consumed the entire facility. On Feb. 18, burnt batteries reignited. The pleas from residents to protect their health and safety began immediately and have continued since. 

Now, nine months after the fire started, Church is asking his colleagues on the Board of Supervisors to consider a moratorium on BESS facilities until the County crafts an ordinance specifically to regulate them. 

I asked Church, why now, nine months later? One factor is that it has taken a long time for him and his staff to get answers. “There was a lot of digging into and understanding what the role of the County has been and should be, and what the role of the State has been and should be,” Church says. He spoke to policymakers up and down the state about BESS regulations and got ideas along the way. “It reached a point where I felt I had enough information,” he says. 

There were also other moratoriums adopted in other places. Solano County already had one in 2024; Orange County implemented one in 2025, inspired by the catastrophe in Moss Landing. Church watched to see if there were legal challenges; there were not. 

The other factor is the temperature in the room that I mentioned up top. “By waiting, I hope we can have a little less reactive environment, [and instead] a more thoughtful environment,” Church says. 

I hope so too. This approach is a productive measure—it’s not a call to forbid all battery storage development but to table it temporarily (up to two years), pending the creation and adoption of a county ordinance regulating BESS facilities. 

“This industry is going to continue to grow,” Church says. “Moss Landing is going to be a major center for these batteries. We’re going to have batteries, but we need to have them as safe as possible. 

“I am really hoping Monterey County will be at the forefront of having safe regulations, and let us move forward to the future.”

This is what progress looks like. You can participate in the first discussion of Church’s referral, or listen in, in person or online. The board meets at 1:30pm tomorrow at 168 W. Alisal St., Salinas.

(2) comments

Gregory Vincent

I completely disagree with Supervisor Church, Moss Landing should not have battery storage plants. I'm not saying that they should remove the Tesla battery plant, but the Vistra should not be allowed to rebuild. Nor should any new plants be built in Moss Landing. Who in their right mind thought it was a good idea to put a battery storage plant next to a Marine Wildlife Sanctuary to begin with? Why was the company not required to either pay the county to buy the required fire fighting equipment needed to put out one of these fires or provide it themselves?This was a total oversight by the powers at be to make sure there was the ability to handle any problems that coule and would happen. Is this our East Palestine, where the residents are left holding the bag with no transparency. There has already been another fire in Parkfield and who thought that was a good idea to put it at the epicenter of study of the San Andreas Fault. I don't know, maybe not a good idea to put it on the biggest earthquake fault in California. Things to ponder before any more decisins like this are made in the future.

Walter Wagner

A moratorium to explore alternatives is reasonable. New Lithium batteries are coming on line, and batteries that don't use Lithium are likewise nearing deployment. Further, there is no specific reason to use Moss Landing, a highly ecologically sensitive area with nearby populations. This apparently happened because of cheap warehouse space that was then available. These battery storage areas can readily be placed in outying areas away from farming and people. In addition, though not yet developed other than with dams where water is pumped uphill, having a stoarge system using motors/generators and weights is feasible as well, with NO potential environmental hazard. This needs full exploration, as the numbers pencil out.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.