David Schmalz here. For all the things I’ve covered over the years at the Weekly, there’s no topic that’s been harder for me to get a read on than Monterey-Salinas Transit’s SURF! project, a proposed busway that would pave over much of the railway parallel to Highway 1 from Marina to Sand City, which would ostensibly facilitate a more efficient commute time for those taking public transit between Marina and Monterey, though there is disagreement about that.
I grew up in the Bay Area, and lived there many years as an adult, and I loved taking BART to wherever it could take me—as a kid, my friends and I would go to Chinatown in San Francisco, to Oakland A’s games, whatever. Our parents trusted us, and let us live in the wild without their supervision and, as a result, we had all manner of adventures.
So, point being, I love trains, and public transit—it was central to my youth, and my growth.
That’s why I was intrigued by a June 3 letter to the Transportation Agency for Monterey County from the nonprofit Train Riders Association of California (TRAC), which countered the SURF! proposal with one that would introduce a rail line in Marina and Monterey.
But, as I’ve recently confirmed in numerous discussions, that proposal has no traction at the moment—not a single meeting has been held about it—and while it purports the cost for the rail line would be about $78 million, Todd Muck, TAMC’s executive director, thinks it would be over $200 million. I don’t trust cost estimates anymore, though I feel compelled to report them—the cost of every project is on an upward trajectory, and delays make them add up.
Muck also adds that, before his time at TAMC, there was an effort to bring rail back on the line between Marina and Monterey, but that because of political headwinds about bringing trains back along the now-paved-over rail at Window on the Bay, it was untenable.
I could go on and on about the various bureaucratic peculiarities about the laws governing how the SURF! project will play out, but that being said, I have no good sense for how it will land.
Most immediately, it will come down to the California Coastal Commission, which, while a government agency enforcing the Coastal Act, is also a political body—the staff has expressed opposition to the project on account of its impacts on environmentally sensitive habitat, among other things, but ultimately, whether the agency approves it will come down to the commissioners. That vote is expected to come sometime this summer.
But there’s a lot of momentum in support of the project, too, because at least for now, it’s fully funded with tens of millions of dollars, thanks in large part to state grants.
Though I’m also picking up a lot of headwinds blowing against it—not a single Marina resident I’ve spoken to wants the project to move forward.
I don’t know what’s going to happen with SURF! but I wish that, instead of a busway, we had a train.
There used to be one, the Del Monte, that went from Pacific Grove to San Francisco, but it was discontinued in 1971.
Shame about that. I wasn’t even born yet. I would love to bring that line back, but I ain’t holding my breath, except to try not to inhale the exhaust of the cars that people have chosen as the alternative.
(3) comments
I'm revisiting this older article one last time as a thought came to me regarding the old Del Monte Express.
Sacramento is a rail-integrated part of the Northern California Megaregion but the Monterey coastal area is not. I know this because I have coworkers who commute to San Jose from Sacramento by rail.
Perhaps the TAMC should consider accelerating plans to reconnect Marina/Seaside to Gilroy and San Jose via rail. It was my understanding that something similar to this was supposedly being explored by the Monterey Bay Area Rail Network Integration Study.
MST’s county-wide ridership actually declined by 6.8% from 2000 to 2019 despite a population growth of 6.4% for that same period. This is based on MST’s own data that was submitted to the American Public Transportation Association.
TAMC and MST should instead pursue the longer-term and more flexible solution of widening Hwy 1 at Sand City’s Fremont Blvd. The third lane can then be used as a HOV/Busway lane on weekdays and as a metered express lane on weekends.
Thank-you for this article. We have to re-learn the value of rail travel. Unfortunately, SuRF! Is a step backwards.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.