It was a famous rallying cry for British colonists hankering for American independence 250 years ago: “No taxation without representation.”
Now, that theme is bubbling up in conversations about how Marina Coast Water District supplies water to developments on the former Fort Ord – and whether the decision-making process is democratic.
Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) contracts with Marina Coast for water delivery and wastewater services on the developed portions of Fort Ord. Based on historic Army water use, Marina Coast has rights to draw 6,600 acre-feet from the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin to supply the Ord Community. But full Fort Ord buildout, according to the Regional Urban Water Augmentation Project (RUWAP), requires 9,000.
The 2,400 acre-foot deficit between current water rights and future water needs factors into the FORA board’s budget deliberations. “Finishing development in Seaside [and other jurisdictions] will require augmenting the water supply,” FORA Executive Officer Michael Houlemard says.
The RUWAP calls for Marina Coast to produce 1,200 acre-feet of potable water through seawater desalination, estimated at $3,000 per acre-foot; and 1,200 acre-feet of non-potable water through wastewater recycling, at $4,000 per acre-foot.
But Marina Coast isn’t moving on either of those goals. As the FORA board considers its budget, officials are asking Marina Coast how it intends to produce that water.
“We still have to figure out the when and the how,” Marina Coast Interim General Manager Brian Lee says.
Lee argues it doesn’t make sense to start investing in a new water supply right away. Although FORA developer fees would ultimately generate $24 million for water-supply plans, Lee says, Ord Community ratepayer bills could double or triple.
Yet Marina Coast doesn’t really need new water yet. Last year, it used only 2,300 acre-feet of its Ord Community groundwater credits – leaving more than 4,000 to spare. He says entities with Fort Ord land but no immediate plans to build could share their water allocations with Seaside in the meantime.
“It doesn’t seem like good planning or good use of resources to [produce water] at a higher cost per acre-foot, when if you look at the entire Ord Community right now, it’s not needed,” Lee says. “If FORA tells us to build it, we will build it. But we will collect the money for it as well.”
Seaside officials have known for some time that they don’t have enough water credits for their Ord Community plans. Marina Coast estimates Seaside will be 1,084 acre-feet short of its needed water supply in 2030. Much of that could flow to the proposed equestrian-themed project, Monterey Downs, which needs an estimated 853 acre-feet.
Another issue: Seasiders in the Ord Community pay for Marina Coast water but don’t vote for board members.
“Currently there’s not representation of Seaside residents on the Marina Coast board,” Seaside City Engineer Tim O’Halloran says. “That’s an issue that needs to be resolved.”
Lee says it’s being addressed: Marina Coast plans to ask the Local Agency Formation Commission to annex the Ord Community into its political boundaries within five years.
(3) comments
Maybe I'm just dreaming here, but it seems from what I'm reading that Marina Coast is sitting in the cat-bird's seat,water rights and all..And wasn't it Calcagno who managed to divert water from RUWAP in the Regional Project to his pal Tony Lombardo's Laguna Seca's project??? So be sure to subtract those ac/ft...And still the rate payers pay...The Regional Project is still viable folks....10,000 ac/ft, all permitted, just what the State Board calls for and that lousy BOS managed to mess up so terribly...
I believe Seaside officials should be asking Lou Calcagno, Dave Potter, Lew Bauman, Charles McKee and Cal Am where their development water is going to come from. The answer was the Regional Project, now that the County and Cal Am tubed that, who knows? It sure as heck is not the group of projects with no water rights that we are now spending millions of dollars for.
Houlemard, remember how those "developer fees" were cut and scaled back and reduced? Remember all the public benefit lost when you lobbied to recommend the reductions in fees? Now you're promising "developer fees" will pay for water? Isn't FORA bankrupt YET? Maybe when Rabobank calls that hostile takeover loan you floated to steal Preston Park from Marina we can hear the last from you, the developer's best friend ever.
And Houlemard, "finishing development in Seaside," including your wretched horse race track and casino, will bury Monterey Bay and make it uninhabitable and inhospitable for locals and even more unattractive for the wealthy tourist trade.
I'd suggest MCWD tend to their ratepayers and constituents. Seaside officials may have known for some time that they don’t have enough water, but they sure weren't admitting it until forced to the wall. Let them drink piss.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.