Rising Tides

After years of non-compliance with state law, Monterey’s revenue from Fisherman’s Wharf leases will finally flow into its Tidelands Trust Fund.

Vocal opponents of the city’s plan to modernize leasing guidelines on Fisherman’s Wharf often point to the Tidelands Trust Fund as an example of the city’s mistreatment of wharf tenants. The common claim is that the city has been illegally siphoning rent from Fisherman’s Wharf properties into the general fund, shortchanging waterfront businesses.

The issue at hand is whether the city of Monterey disburses its waterfront revenues fairly. The two wharfs, parts of Cannery Row and all other property below mean high tide are considered “tidelands.”

The state constitution prohibits private ownership of these lands. In the early 1980s, the state of California began to require that all money generated from the tidelands – in Monterey, it’s almost entirely from leases – must be reinvested in the tidelands through a trust fund. This reinvestment could be in the form of park maintenance or added infrastructure on commercial sites.

In 1983, the city of Monterey created its Tidelands Trust. For the past 33 years, all revenue generated from Cannery Row leases have gone to the trust, which was $1.8 million for the 2015-16 fiscal year. The fund currently has a balance of $8.5 million.

Yet throughout the 1980s, the city of Monterey failed to funnel revenue from Fisherman’s Wharf leases into the trust. Starting in 1983, the California State Lands Commission pressed Monterey to bring its books into full compliance, and city officials pledged they would. But by 1987, when budget cutbacks eliminated the commission’s enforcement capacity, nothing had changed.

The improper placement of the funds did not come to light until 2014, when Jimmy Forbis, the city’s new finance manager, saw that only Cannery Row, and not the wharfs, was paying into the trust.

Forbis then contacted the State Lands Commission and initiated an audit of the prior seven years to determine whether the city was using funds from Fisherman’s Wharf and Municipal Wharf II to fund non-tidelands city operations.

What the audit revealed is that from 2007-2014, Monterey spent $12 million on the two wharfs’ properties and only brought in $10 million in rent.

That means that in practical terms, the city Monterey has subsidized the wharf tidelands by $2 million.

Monterey officially recategorized wharf leases to the Tidelands Trust Fund on July 1.

The State Lands Commission is expected to approve the city’s Tidelands Trust policy by the end of the year.

(2) comments

Jon Chown


The following email is clear evidence that the city has misled the MC Weekly and the paper failed to check what it was told and just passed on the misinformation. The city's Tidelands Audit is still being reviewed by the State Lands Commission, more than a year after the city has claimed the issue is past. Also, notice how the "excess" is no longer $2 million, but now just $192,123. A hard review would further diminish this number and if the SLC enforced its rules strictly, the city would owe its Tidelands Fund nearly $10 million. When will the MC Weekly during a real review of this problem and stop taking the city's word?
1
Garrett, Jamie@SLC
From: Boggiano, Reid@SLC
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 11:34 AM
To: Jimmy Forbis
Subject: RE: Monterey - Revised Tidelands Audit
Thank you, Jimmy. I’ll be in touch shortly.
From: Jimmy Forbis [mailto:forbis@monterey.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 1:40 PM
To: Boggiano, Reid@SLC
Subject: Monterey - Revised Tidelands Audit
Hello Reid - attached are two documents for your review.
1. The revised Tidelands Activities for the seven year period beginning in FY 2007-08. This revision eliminates
the adjacent properties from the calculation and shows that the City's General Fund has subsidized the
Tidelands Trust Fund $192,123 over that same time.
2. Revised FY 14-15 Tidelands Activities Report which resembles our accounting structure going forward.
Thank you for your patience on this matter. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Jimmy Forbis, CPFO
Finance Director
City of Monterey
(831) 646-3940
www.monterey.org/finance

Jon Chown

This is misinformation and its appalling it is passed on so easily by "journalists." Journalism requires checking facts and sources. Did anybody call the State Lands Commission about this audit. If they had, they would know that the city resubmitted a new audit, with many expenses removed because they were attributed to areas adjacent to Tidelands properties. The new audit shows just about an even balance between expenses and revenue and it's full of questionable stuff as well. I have shared an email with the writer of this story that was sent from the City of Monterey to the State Lands Commission on Sept. 13. I got it by filing a FOIA request from the State Lands Commission. So, the Monterey County Weekly knows this story is wrong. It's just misinformation being passed from the city to the public via a lazy press.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.